Forever young!

Forever Young!

Catcher in the Rye is a well-known novel written by J.D. Salinger, who actually did not like how famous his masterpiece became… In this way, he did not like the idea of being famous, he hated being recognized and that its novel became bestseller since it is known that those categories belong to books that actually are not very good, but of course this one is an exception. Nevertheless, that is not the topic that I’m going to discuss now on this post. I would really like to reflect on the fact that causes the protagonist of the novel Holden Caulfield to be so angry with his surroundings and with the people in general because of their hypocrisy. Firstly, I am going to connect the idea of this novel with two different things; one is a relation that I have thought about when starting reading and understanding fully the meaning of this book, and the other one is the relation it has with an author and a novel of the beat generation.

It is not difficult to understand, if you have read the novel, that the enemy this young man was fighting to. Was it Mollock? Haha.. Unfortunately not, it was maybe something worse since it is something you cannot beat. It is useless to fight it. You cannot win it. Can you guess what could it be? No, yes, you’re close! And yes, it is TIME. Who has never thought about freezing time to change something or to have more of it to do something or to enjoy your youth? I think most of us have. But as I have already said, and as you also may clearly know, it is useless. We cannot stop time or prevent ourselves to grow up, and get older. This is one of the reasons why Holden was so upset, because he was feeling helpless. He knew he could not stop himself of getting older and losing his innocence.

Who does not want to be a kid forever? Why do we have to grow up and become less innocent about the world issues that tend to be getting worse? It is nice and comfortable to live in a bubble where everything you do is play and have fun! Why does it have to end? Why do we have to study, and then work, and then get so old that we can’t even have fun anymore because all parts of our body hurt? It is a sad reality. Maybe, or clearly, time has not the fault in all this…but our society that is built that way… can we change it? How? Would exist that day in which this routine of life changes? It is something difficult to figure out certainly.

We all have complained about something as inevitable as time, and it clearly remembers me about a character that refuses deeply to get older and does not want to grow up, and wants to play all the time without having any responsibilities. Does it ring any bell? Haha yeah, it is the famous Peter Pan. What an amazing character. I believe most of us have seen its movie, read the book, or at least heard of him. He is the happiest kid ever, living the everyday life without getting older. Would Holden have wanted to be like Peter Pan? Absolutely, as far as I’m concerned, he would have loved to! But even in this story the time is present and there are kids that want to grow up and live the life as it is established. Wendy is a clear example of that. She knew that being a kid forever is not possible, and that at some time you have to follow the circle of life.

On the other hand, Catcher in the Rye may have some similarities with the other well-known novel Howl by Allen Ginsberg. In both stories there was an enemy, not the same one, but both characters expressed their anger against them. Both showed their desperation in order to catch other people’s attention to demonstrate their frustration and anger. In Howl, the enemy is in a way “fightable” since this novel represents how America is, and how wrong its system works. The point here is to change America’s view of life. Mollock presents the America’s system; in fact it is the worst enemy, and the one that should be changed.

But what moral can we take from Howl? It is possible to state that we should always reflect on the system in which we are immersed. Howl and Catcher in the Rye show us that we should think beyond about everything since we mostly believe that all we have is good enough, but it isn’t. It also has its bad side and that is what these novels wanted us to see. We just live our lives without taking into consideration what is beyond it, which could actually change it to be something better than it is now.

It is important to think about these aspects sometimes, it may be disappointing to realize all this, but it is preferable to be aware of it than being blind and satisfied. It gives us hope to think that maybe we can do something about it; maybe doing little changes can be comforting. One clear example can be the students of Chile that fight for different things, and now for a free education system and other relevant things. It is worth it to fight for! It gives us hope. But is it worth it to fight something as Time? I don’t think so, what do you think?

Eternal youth or death

The catcher in the rye, written by J. D. Salinger, is the story about a boy, Holden Caulfield, who shows a rebellious personality with the people that surrounds him. He is constantly criticizing how society corrupts you when you grow up, which reminds me of several facts including other books, poems, and facts from another centuries.

The first relationship is with the novel “Lord of the flies” written by William Goulding, which sets you in the story of a group of boys that have to survive with no adults since their airplane fell in an island, so they divide each other in groups to make an easier organization for living. The similarity I see between both stories, is that when the boys are left alone in a place with no rules, there is a moment where they collapse and savagery is shown, because there is no law or protection and so chaos and violation of rules appears when children have to act like adults.

Then the deal is in growing up, children characterize with their innocence and how they are not yet “infected” with adult thinking. What happens when the natural process of life is not “respected”, when trying to be adults being children as in Lord of the Flies, where the kids ended up as savages, or when trying to maintain childhood as an adult, as The Catcher in the rye.

The catcher in the rye, in simple words shows Holden trying to emulate childhood in an adult’s body, where he describes everyone as a phony, as fake or not real, while he appears to be the only one who has remained genuine and authentic with society, because he could not identify with the experiences he had had as an adult.

As an example, “The Catcher in the rye” as most know, was also an inspiration for the killer of John Lennon, since the story can be related with a metaphor of freezing time, because when time passes and we keep growing up, we then notice that the world is disturbed. So the impulse that probably drove the killer was to prevent this disillusion of continuing meeting life imperfectly, so we could all remember the image of the this musical idol as if he was frozen. But if we also put an example of famous cases of massacres in schools in the US, commonly the murderous minds are people who could never adapt or understand common society and occidental civilization. These misfits patterns from murderers have a straight relationship with the protagonist, Holden.

When Holden explains Phoebe he has a fantasy he pictured from a poem of being a “catcher in the rye.” Holden imagines a field of rye on a cliff with children playing. He says he would like to protect the children from falling off the cliff by “catching” them. But actually Holden had mistaken the poem because he thinks it says “If a body catch a body coming through the rye,” but the actual poem says “If a body meet a body, coming through the rye.” This is where Holden shows that he would like to prevent children from falling into the adult’s world as if pain and troubles comes from becoming older.

So the reflection is in Holden wanting to prevent lifeline process from continuing, which it might see authoritarian and selfish in the same way as the killer of John Lennon. From an extremist point of view there is not a possible way of having a catcher in rye if death is not involved, stopping natural course of things would be by ending life, so you would forever remember that individual as before they died. This reminds me of post mortem photography, that was practiced during the XIX century, which consisted in photographing the recently deceased as a memorial portrait and it was not considered morbid, since it was done to remember the loved ones just how they left and were among families most precious possessions.

 She will be a child

Forever

So I see a straight relation with death, when Holden goes to a mental hospital it comes to my mind the poem Howl by Allen Ginsberg, who belonged to the Beat Generation, which is known from being inspired of his own life experiences. In the poem there is a relation with death and mental hospitals as they are a kind of concentration camps where creative minds are in captivity and are not able to express their selves, representing the US during the 50s as industries are consuming society. The similarity I see between both is that the vision Ginsberg has, shows that if something is somehow limited and if we stop things or if we are being stopped from doing, it is like being dead. In the same way as being a catcher in the rye, trying to maintain childhood and interrupting natural lifetime means death.

Ps: I apologize if a bothered someone with my thoughts and the picture of the girl.

References:

Salinger, J.D (1951). The Catcher in the Rye.

Golding, W., & Epstein, E. L. (1954). Lord of the flies: A novel. New York: Perigee

Ginsberg, A., Williams, W. C. (1959). Howl and other poems.

Kenneth, V (2003) Macmillan Encyclopedia of Death and Dying

A fairy tale

The 19th Century is often called “the romantic era”. Romanticism was a movement which that deals with the beauty of nature and human emotions (Cambridge Dictionaries, 2016). Hollywood, with its silly, cheese and unrealistic stories, has shown us that it seems to be no place for truly romantic heroes in our current society.

Catcher in the rye is a novel written by J.D. Salinger in 1951; it presents the story of Holden Caulfield and his existentialist and nihilist questioning about people and their role in the world. However, another appreciation can show us this apathetic teenager as a romantic hero fighting against the world. Holden is the typical maverick and rebel fighting against the world, a society full of phonies which he does not want to be part.

“Typically, the Romantic poet-persona seeks the ideal in terms connection with a mysterious and elusive female, who often turns out to be a reflection of his desire for self-fulfillment. Because the poet considers this often-exotic female as the Other and, primarily, in terms of his own male ego, women appear as idealizations, not individuals” (Page, 2002).

Holden idealized conceptions of people and speaking specifically to women; he manifests that “women kill me. They really do. I don't mean I'm oversexed or anything like that….I just like them, I mean. They're always leaving their goddam bags out in the middle of the aisle.” (Salinger, 1951). This observation, referring to the lady he meets in the train, seems to give women a halo of innocence and authenticity; they act spontaneously almost like a child.  The pureness of childhood is mostly represented by the strongest female figures in the novel, Phoebe and Jane, both representing different periods of Holden ´s life; Phoebe, as the simplicity of natural, the perfection of childhood and, on the other side, Jane as his own stage of maturity, adolescence.

“In this moment as never woman is considered muse, ideal, treasure, celestial body, angel, unreachable star, inspiration, etc. In short, it is "the other", the exotic, the natural, wild and uncultivated, in what the disenchanted man of romanticism aims to solve his nostalgia for the lost ideal” (Hardisson, 2002). Romantic literature´s images of women are depicted in terms of idealization as central axis of love; spiritualized entities as a representation of nature creatures driven just by instincts. 

In addition, romantic poets paid special attention to female inner beauty. That is the reason why he hated that Stradlater thought he could have sex with every woman without paying attention of her personality details as Jane´s fixation of never take her kings out of the black row Physical descriptions of Jane are almost inexistent, except for that moment in which Holden tells she is not precisely pretty but she drive him crazy.

Besides, Holden´s romantic perception of women is also reflected in his perception of sexuality. First of all Holden is a virgin who have had opportunities to lose his virginity yet he never could. For Holden having sex with a woman would make her an object but more than that it make her real; losing the aura of romantic passion which characterizes a romantic novel.

Holden´s view of Jane is a clear example of Romantic idealization. She is presented in the novel as non-present, and ethereal entity making her transparent and clear for the narrator´s eyes. According to Holden, the time he was most close to “make love with her” was actually comforting her when she was crying; a very romantic knightly and deeply emotional way of connection.

“Old Jane. Every time I got to the part about her out with Stradlater in that damn Ed Banky's car, it almost drove me crazy”(Salinger, 1951). This desperation reflects his fear of losing Jane´s angels figure and facing her as real; a person with desire and imperfections and these feelings motivates him to escape from school.

However, it contrasts with another romantic stereotype presented in the novel, women as an object of love and desire. “That's the thing about girls. Every time they do something pretty…you fall half in love with them, and then you never know where the hell you are…. They can drive you crazy” (Salinger, 1951). Romantic literature mostly essentializes femininity with the quality of sensuality which inspires the male poetic capacity (Hardisson, 2002).

At the same time Holden despises sex as something we would not do with a girl he cares, he claims women neither help men to not destroy the aura of romantic love. It is a constant internal battle, when he shows up human nature full of contradictions.

All in all, from my point of view, Holden idealization of women and incapacity to see them in a sexual way reflects his rejection to adult world. Holden wants to still live in a world where female presences in his life are untouchable fairies instead of accepting that women are imperfect individuals who feel desire.

Holden are Jane are in the edge of the cliff in the rye and Holden´s inability to see her as a woman, an adult show us Holden´s fear to let her fall as are representation of his own inevitable process of maturity. By opposing these two places, the rye and cliff, the novel aims to contrast Holden´s conception of childhood as a romantic, utopian, immaculate and authentic place, as Phoebe represents; and his conception of adulthood as place never ending fall full of phonies and culpability.

All in all, Holden decided chose not to run away and confront his life, but not before say goodbye to the rye.

References:

Cambridge Free English Dictionary and Thesaurus (n.d). Retrieved June, 2016, from http://dictionary.cambridge.org/

Hardisson, A. (2002). Una mirada feminista al Romanticismo . Obtenido de Revista Intelectuales: http://intelectuales.mypressonline.com/PDF/Una_mirada_feminista.pdf

Page, J.W. (2002) Images Of Women In Romantic Period Literature. In Women's Studies Encyclopedia, ed. Helen Tierney. Greenwood Press, 2002. <http://www.gem.greenwood.com>

Salinger, J. D. (1951). The catcher in the rye. Boston: Little, Brown.