The play “Who’s afraid
of Virginia Woolf” written by Edward Albee situates the reader into this evident
aggressive and toxic relationship, interpreted by Martha and George. This
married couple are the entire time showing their strong personalities and
fighting in front of their young guests, Honey and Nick.
It is curious to go
over George’s development during the play, a man who at the beginning seems to
be a cold man with intellectual thoughts hidden on alcohol.
Analogy of the play with an article of Arts for
education:
George is constantly
comparing history with science; biology, where he mocks about the chromosomes
making a relationship with making a “pure” race.
George: …”a certain
type of regulation will be necessary…uh…for the experiment to succeed. A
certain number of sperm tubes will have to be cut.
…Which will assure the
sterility of the imperfect… the ugly, the stupid… the unfit.
…With this, we will
have, in time a race of glorious men.
…I suspect we will not have much music, much painting but
we will have a civilization of men, smooth, blond, and right at the
middleweight limit.
…a race of scientists
and mathematicians.
…There will be a certain loss of liberty I imagine, as
a result of this experiment…cultures and races will eventually vanish”.
There are studies related
to arts in education which state that it may help students increase their academic
results, but it has been lost in application during the years. This is because new cultural forces replaced the customs from the artistically
wave European immigrants left in the past. As
a result, market forces have pushed arts away.
Contextualizing the
above said, in the middle of the 20th century, there was a big impact of arts because
of European immigrants. They exported traditions from their cultures and
imported arts into the US community and schools.
“Consider schools that need 4 hours of
English, 4 of math and 3 of science credits to receive the “standard diploma” –
and only 1 credit in speech or art. Computer science and technology courses
crowd out arts options among electives…
It isn’t just the arts that are
suffering from this focus on vocational training, Greene explained.
“Literature, poetry, history, classics and the rest of the humanities are
getting hit along with the arts.”
There is a
similarity with the above, where humanities can be left behind because science
predominates because it is exact and society is always is searching for
explicit results.
The point is that humanities are essential for humans’
development, a sometimes called inexact science, since they give a broader
spectrum to our lives.
“Pointing out public health advancements
are increasing the life span of Americans, O’Hare asked: Why prolong life if
it’s not worth living? That’s what the arts do. They make life worth living.
Even if your math scores don’t go up.”
When I read your post it quickly came to my mind a time when I heard “what is really the aim of an athlete? If he/she wins the world championship, the medal, what is next?”. It may be common to hear that questioning on “rationale minds” who do not find the purpose in disciplines which seems not to have any practical use for survival. Therefore, people as George can get defensive when talking about their field of studies. However, as you mentioned before, arts should not be defended, justified and given reasons to be consider as functional for X purposes since its entire essence its beyond practicality and tangible results; arts can be seen as deep and developmental experiences which are actually the fundamentals of education.
ResponderEliminar