The Catcher in the Rye, written by J.D. Salinger ,
is a work piece that, in the raw words of a 16 year old boy, deals with topics
such as confusion, maturity, distress, among others; however, one of the facts
that caught my attention the most (besides the language used, pretty
unfamiliar, although close and catchy) is how our protagonist, Holden Caulfield,
deals with hypocrisy during the whole reading.
Phonies. Let’s talk about phonies in this one. Holden
clarifies that he is surrounded by phonies; false people with false living,
falsehood everywhere. To make it clearer, on the very first page he states that
his own brother used to be a terrific
writer, but now his just a sellout; a prostitute of Hollywood. He even says
that movies (probably an observation not only of the character itself but from
the writer) are false for showing fake roles, fake emotions; and the people at
movies who laughed at stuff that was not funny at all were phonies too. However, as a result of all his experiences on
his narration, Holden kind of retreat his feeling of criticizing everything as
false in the last fragment of the novel.
Overall, Holden Caulfield results
to be one of the most loved character in American literature, as well as The
Catcher in the Rye one of the most read novels in the mentioned country.
Notwithstanding, there are some special moments in history were this book was
controversial, and not precisely for its message, but for its reception and
backlash.
It’s well-known the moment in
which a man, allegedly insane, shot dead a famous artist, and waited for the
police to arrest him while reading The Catcher in the Rye in the crime scene;
I’m talking about Mark David Chapman, who on December 8th, 1980, discharged
his weapon against John Lennon, at the entrance of the building where Lennon
resided. Lennon was a musician and peace activist; Chapman, a huge follower of
Holden Caulfield’s image and thinking. Lennon was an atheist, as he expressed
on his work; Chapman, a “born again” Christian. Mark Chapman thought that
Lennon was a phony for being an activist of peace and social justice, and yet
he did not
followed the path of God, which had no sense for Chapman.
After the murder, Chapman sat
near Lennon and proceeded to read The Catcher in the Rye, in the wait for his
arrest. When the police confiscated his book, they found the sentence “this is
my statement”, signed by Holden Caulfield, exposing his obsession of emulating
the fictional character.
But not only Chapman was obsessed
by this character: John Hinckley, who tried to kill President Ronald Reagan,
happened to have a copy of the novel on the coffee table of his house, found by
the police. Robert John Bardo, who had mental issues, who also had little to
none tolerance to falsehood, and who
stalked Madonna and the actress Samantha Smith, found the American actress and
model Rebecca Schaeffer alone in her domicile and killed her in 1989, having a
copy of the book with him on the crime scene, the same as Chapman did.
We cannot say that The Catcher in
the Rye is a book that encourages people to be murderers; if that would be the
case, there should be hundred or million cases similar to what happened with
Chapman, Bardo or Hinckley. But after reading the book, which may be the
overall factor that triggered this behavior, and consequently these mentioned
events?
References:
http://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/1965201-introducing-the-catcher-criminals
http://www.hiddenmysteries.org/conspiracy/reststory/fbirye.html
References:
http://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/1965201-introducing-the-catcher-criminals
http://www.hiddenmysteries.org/conspiracy/reststory/fbirye.html
Hi Felipe!
ResponderEliminarIt was very interesting to read your post. It was also frightening to figure out all those experiences that some people had lived after reading this book. From my point of view, it may not have been just the book what caused them to act like that (killing important people), but something else. It is clear that they may have had some mental issues that contributed to their behavior. Nevertheless, it is crazy to find out that they had their books with them after the killing... Why did they carry it with them? It is very strange.
On the other hand, I find it very nice of your part to connect the book with all these actions that occur on our history, that such important characters as John Lennon was murdered by a fun of this book. It is true that this book may open our minds to many big issues so that we question many things of human lives, but how can it really affect some other minds? How can other people interprete it so deeply?
To sum up, I really liked your post! It was very compelling!
Thank you for sharing it!